Untitled

🎁From Gift to Project🔩

How Different Definitions of Faith Shape the Election Debate

When Calvinists say that Arminian election sounds like a “workout,” they are not usually accusing Arminians of crass works-righteousness. At least, not if they are being careful. What they are reacting to is not the language of effort so much as the structure of the system. More specifically, they are reacting to how faith itself is defined.

Because once faith subtly shifts from gift received to project maintained, assurance starts to feel less like rest and more like exertion. Even if no one intends it.

Faith as Reception or Faith as Response

At the heart of the disagreement is a deceptively simple question:

What is faith?

Calvinists tend to speak of faith primarily as something given. Not merely enabled, but bestowed. Faith is not just made possible by grace. It is created by grace.

“For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8).

From this angle, faith is the open hand, not the reaching arm. It is the evidence that salvation has already been applied, not the lever that activates it. Faith does not move God. God moves, and faith appears as the result.

Arminians, by contrast, tend to speak of faith as something exercised. Still enabled by grace, still impossible without divine initiative, but nevertheless genuinely chosen and enacted by the human person. Faith is a response to grace, not simply the consequence of it.

Both sides appeal to Scripture. Both affirm grace. The difference lies in where faith sits in the causal chain.

And that difference changes how salvation feels.

Why Calvinists Hear “Work” Where None Is Intended

From a Calvinist perspective, once faith is something that must be continually exercised in order to remain elect, it begins to function as a condition that must be met over time. Not a meritorious work, but a necessary contribution.

Even if the Arminian insists, “Faith is not a work,” the Calvinist hears, “Faith is the decisive human act that keeps the covenant intact.”

That is where the workout language creeps in.

Not because Arminians are preaching moralism, but because the burden of final distinction appears to rest, at least in part, on sustained human response. The believer must continue believing in order to remain chosen. The faith that saves must also be the faith that endures.

To the Calvinist ear, this sounds like salvation has been turned from a finished gift into an ongoing project.

The Fear Beneath the Critique

It is important to name what is really being protected here.

Calvinists are deeply concerned with assurance. Not theoretical assurance, but existential assurance. The kind of assurance that holds when the conscience accuses, when faith feels weak, when obedience stumbles, when emotions collapse.

If faith is something I must keep producing, even with grace’s help, then the question inevitably arises:

Have I believed enough?

Have I continued faithfully enough?

Have I responded well enough?

Calvinists worry that this framework, however unintentionally, trains believers to look inward rather than upward. To monitor the strength of their faith rather than the sufficiency of Christ.

That is why they push so hard on faith as gift. Not to deny responsibility, but to preserve rest.

Where Calvinists Can Overstate the Case

Here is where self-awareness is needed.

Many Arminians do not experience their faith as a treadmill. They rest deeply in Christ. They pray boldly. They trust God sincerely. Their lived piety often looks more peaceful than the caricature suggests.

Moreover, Calvinists are not immune to turning faith into a project themselves. Election can quietly become a badge. Perseverance can morph into performance. Assurance can be grounded more in theological correctness than in Christ Himself.

The danger Calvinists warn against is real. But the danger is not exclusive to Arminian systems. The human heart is remarkably creative at turning gifts into tests.

Two Different Pastoral Instincts

At bottom, this debate is driven by two pastoral instincts, both biblical.

Calvinists fear presumption. They fear turning faith into something we manage. They want sinners exhausted by self-effort to hear that Christ has done it all, and that even their believing is upheld by God’s hand.

Arminians fear fatalism. They fear turning faith into something automatic or impersonal. They want believers to hear the real weight of Scripture’s calls to believe, to endure, to obey, and to take warnings seriously.

Both instincts are trying to protect the gospel. They simply protect it from different angles.

Why the Language Matters

When Calvinists describe Arminian election as a workout, they are usually reacting to what they perceive as a shift in faith’s role. From evidence of salvation to instrument of continuation. From resting reception to active maintenance.

Whether that critique is fair in every case is debatable. But understanding why it is made helps lower the temperature.

This is not primarily a debate about effort versus laziness. It is a debate about where confidence finally rests.

Is faith the sign that Christ has saved me, or the condition that keeps me saved?

Is assurance anchored in God’s decree, or in my ongoing response?

Those answers shape not only theology, but the spiritual posture of the believer.

And that is why this conversation refuses to go away.