top of page

Is Baptism Only for Believers? Covenant Answers Explained

📔💧Article 9 Objections to Paedobaptism: Honest Questions, Covenant Answers


The Waters That Remember

Part III – The Biblical Pattern


> “We do not wait for fruit to plant the tree.”


It’s a question whispered in hallways, murmured over coffee, or asked with nervous sincerity in Sunday school classes:

“But isn’t baptism only for believers?”

Others follow close behind—“There’s no infant baptism in the New Testament,” “The New Covenant is only for the regenerate,” and “Isn’t baptism a public profession of faith?”


These are not wicked questions. They are honest ones. And they often come from brothers and sisters who deeply love Scripture and want to honor the Lord.

But they also come from a theological ecosystem formed more by revivalism than by covenant. More by modern evangelicalism than historic Christianity. More by reaction than reflection.


This article isn’t written to rebuke. It’s written to shepherd—to walk with you, hand in hand, through what the Scriptures actually say.


Because paedobaptism is not a sentimental tradition—it is a covenantal conviction rooted in God’s promise and patterned by His Word.


---


Objection 1: “Baptism is only for believers.”


It’s true that adult converts are baptized upon profession of faith.

But when Scripture speaks of households, of promises to “you and your children,” of covenant signs—it paints a broader picture.


The New Covenant doesn’t erase generational inclusion. It fulfills and expands it.


> “The promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off…” – Acts 2:39


Children of believers are not baptized because they already believe. They are baptized because God has claimed them within His covenant household.

They are being raised into faith under the banner of Christ.


Baptism is the beginning of discipleship, not its trophy.


---


Objection 2: “There’s no explicit infant baptism in the New Testament.”


This is a fair observation—but not a decisive one.

There’s also no record of a Christian child growing up in the church being baptized after professing faith. That silence is telling.


We don’t reject the Trinity or the Lord’s Day because the words aren’t directly spelled out. We discern the doctrine through the whole counsel of God.


And we do see households baptized. Lydia’s. The jailer’s. Stephanas’.

Not one word in those passages excludes the children.


Scripture doesn’t need to repeat the inclusion of children—it assumes it.


---


Objection 3: “The New Covenant is only for the regenerate.”


This objection rests on a misreading of Hebrews 8. The chapter describes the inward blessings of the New Covenant—not the visible boundaries of the church.


Just as not every circumcised Israelite was regenerate, not every baptized church member is either. But both were rightly included in the covenant community.


To claim the New Covenant is only for the regenerate is to deny the reality of hypocrites, apostates, and false converts in the visible church.


The distinction between the visible and invisible church remains. Baptism does not declare who is elect—it declares who is discipled.


---


Objection 4: “Baptism is a public profession of faith.”


It can be. And for adults, it often is. But Scripture never limits it to that definition.


For infants, baptism is not the child’s statement of faith—it is God’s statement of claim.

It is the church’s affirmation of the covenant promise.


Baptism doesn’t say, “This child believes.”

It says, “This child belongs.”


And with that belonging comes the weight of discipleship. The child is not presumed regenerate—they are raised under the command:


> “You shall teach them diligently to your children…” – Deuteronomy 6:7


---


Shepherding, Not Shouting


It’s easy to turn theological disagreement into tribal hostility. But not here.


If you’ve come from a credobaptist background, or were raised with strong revivalist theology—this article isn’t mocking you. It’s inviting you.


To consider that your hesitation might come from culture, not Scripture.

To reread the covenant storyline from Genesis to Revelation.

To let the water run deeper than your assumptions.


We disciple our children before they can speak.

We teach them to pray, to sing, to worship before they fully understand.


Why then should we fence them from the sign that says, “You are Mine, and I will be your God”?


---


Final Thoughts


You may still have questions. That’s good. Questions mean you’re thinking.


But as you wrestle, remember this:

God has always built His kingdom not just through individuals, but through households. Through promises that flow across generations. Through visible signs that mark our homes for Him.


And through baptism—He still says:


> “I will be your God, and the God of your children.”


Come, let the covenant speak louder than the culture.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page